Beginners Guide to French Pronunciation

Rhetorical Analysis Of Chris Christie s Drug - 914 Words

He’s a drug addict: A rhetorical analysis of Chris Christie’s â€Å"Drug Speech† Recently, New Jersey governor and presidential candidate Chris Christie gave a heartfelt speech at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire (Vale). Governor Chris Christie is loved by his supporters and detested by his opponents for his ability to present his points in a moving and effective manner. As much as one might disagree with the governor’s politics, policies, or perhaps pushy personality, it is undeniable that the man can deliver a solid speech. Chris Christie has a way of wrapping his audience around his finger, with every word instilling the exact intended emotion. Chris Christie’s â€Å"Drug Speech† delivers his point on how Americans neglect what he describes as the â€Å"Heroin, cocaine, [and] alcohol† addicts to the listener masterfully through a pairing of anecdotes, using ethos and pathos very effectively. Chris Christie delivers his speech through two personal anecdotes about his mother’s addiction to cigarettes, and an old friend’s battle with hardcore addiction. Christie’s â€Å"Drug Speech† sounds more like part of a conversation than a formal presentation. The usual presidential candidate’s speech consists of facts, statistics, and â€Å"vote for me because I did this† points delivered in succession like reading off a resume. Chris Christie avoids this cliche. His two anecdotes do not have any overly sophisticated vocabulary or unfamiliar terminology. They sound like parts to a talk one would haveShow MoreRelatedDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesbuilt-in pretests and posttests, focus on what you need to learn and to review in order to succeed. Visit www.mymanagementlab.com to learn more. DEVELOPING MANAGEMENT SKILLS EIGHTH EDITION David A. Whetten BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Kim S. Cameron UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Prentice Hall Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York San Francisco Upper Saddle River Amsterdam Cape Town Dubai London Madrid Milan Munich Paris Montreal Toronto Delhi Mexico City Sao Paulo Sydney Hong Kong Seoul Singapore

Sticks and Stones Free Essays

A The words unspoken and actions undone may possibly remain so, but what is done cannot be undone, and if you cause a situation to go from bad to worse, the consequences of your deed will come to haunt you. This is what the main character of Trezza Azzopardi’s short story â€Å"Sticks and Stones†, Lewis, has experienced. Lewis accepts things as they are, even though he wants to change them: â€Å"[†¦]he imagines he’s the kind of person that challenges teachers like Stott and Walker, the kind that the Headmaster takes seriously. We will write a custom essay sample on Sticks and Stones or any similar topic only for you Order Now (pages 9-10, lines 61-62). The quote supports the statement and also implies he is a person who blends in, and more importantly, that he does not want to stand out. Hence, he has adapted to his environment because he feels it is the safest thing to do. This has been caused by his mother, who has told him that â€Å"It’s the survival of the fittest† throughout his whole life. Paul Fry is not peer of Lewis’, but Lewis given his trait of staying in the background emphasizes with him surprisingly much. The ability to emphasize so much with Paul causes Lewis to go against his guts that tells him to mind his own matters, so it must have struck a nerve. Being able to identify with Paul so well means he has experienced something akin to Paul’s inflections, which the small portion of his past underlines: â€Å"Don’t be such a baby. [†¦]boys will be boys. It’s human nature. † (page 10, line 69). He sees himself in Paul Fry, and consequently wants to help because he had no help to claim himself. Lewis’ profession is not stated in the text, but it implicitly indicates that he is a teacher. For instance, the Headmaster catches him after class: â€Å"The next day, Harris (Headmaster) came and found him after class. † (page 10, line 79). Moreover, Paul Fry is a student and when Lewis comes home, he has new information about Paul Fry to tell his girlfriend, Anna: â€Å"[†¦]he wanted to tell her (Anna) about Paul Fry. [†¦]Later, she’d sigh when he came in from work, [†¦]†What’s happened now? † she’d ask† (page 11, lines 98-102). The jump and the whole incident lie to the past, though. The short story is about Lewis reflecting on the past, which is why flashbacks occur in the middle of the storyline. In the present, Lewis has no connection to the involved people of the event. He has quitted teaching after Paul’s death: â€Å"[†¦]on Lewis’s last day, after suggesting he should take some time off. It was the day before Paul Fry was found. † (page 11, lines 120-122) and even though he has an old letter from Anna, he has no contact to her: â€Å"†There’s a letter for you†, his mother shouts. †¦]He’s been there a month now, and[†¦]has had no phone calls, certainly no letters, no nothing at all from Anna. †(page 8, lines 18;21-22) â€Å"Lewis puts it to his face. He can’t find the scent of her in the words† (page 9, line 40). The letter is definitely from Anna and has lost its scent, which implies that it has had one, but has now fad ed with time, which means it is old. The remorse of Paul’s death is so strong that it causes him to dream of his dive into the beach. This indicates it was the same day Paul died, and more so does the fact that the boys had never been all the way to Lewis’ place at the beach. The boys went out to beat up Lewis, because as Lewis tells us, he observed Paul being beat up and making no sound – hence, the death of Paul – and they wanted to shut up Lewis. The use of flashbacks throughout the plot keeps the reader at suspense. Lead on by a in media res start, Trezza Azzopardi keeps building up the suspense. The flashbacks are never out of context: they always occur at a setting relevant to it. As a natural follow-up on the flashbacks, Azzopardi’s short story ends with change in the main character’s person. That is why Lewis throws out the pebbles, because for each pebble he has felt his life was difficult. Paul Fry’s incident has haunted him for long enough and he now wants to move on. After he throws away the pebbles, the waves of the beach does not trouble him anymore and he can finally listen to the humming earth, which indicates the change. A change long awaited caused by merely one devastating mistake. How to cite Sticks and Stones, Essay examples

Flowers for Algernon Essay free essay sample

This change Is from a surgery that he had to make him extremely smart. He wanted the surgery especially to get more friends. He felt that If he was very smart he would gain much more friends. This surgery was a successful for a period of time. It began to wear off a few months after he had It. At the end of the book, Charlie knew things that he didnt know before. He did intellectually At the beginning and end of the book, he was two different people.Also, this ending seemed quite glum and tragic. One way that Charlie has changed from the beginning to the end of the book his ability to remember things increased. At the beginning of the book his memory was not very good at all. At the beginning of the book he said, His name is Burt. I forgot his last name because I dont remember so good. We will write a custom essay sample on Flowers for Algernon Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page At the end of the book, when the surgery had worn off, he could remember things more easily. He knew he had done something great for science, but he Just couldnt remember exactly what he had done.But, he said, Then all of a sudden I remembered some things about the operation and me getting smart and I said holy smokes I rely pulled a Charlie Gordon that time. He also remembered Algerian, and that Algerian had died. Not only could Charlie remember better, but he also had an increase in knowledge from the beginning of the book. Another way that Charlie has changed from the beginning of the book to the end, is that he also had an increase in intelligence. Charlie could think for himself better that he could before.He realized that the bakery was not the place for him to be. He also realized that the Warren State Training School was a better place for him rather than the Warren Home school. Charlie could also feel emotions more than he could before. These were all signs that his Intelligence had Increased. In the book, Charlie said, I know everybody feels sorry for me at the bakery and I dont want the theater so Im going someplace where they are a lot of pull like me and nobody cares that Charlie Gordon was once a genus and now he cant even reed a book or rite good. You can also tell that Charlie can feel emotions better because he said, Thats not true but. I still love her and I still want to be smart but I had to say that so she wood go away. He can think for himself much better than before the surgery. Even though al of these good things have happened, I believe that the ending was very tragic. Charlie had some good, and maybe even great, things happen to him after the surgery had worn off, but still think that the ending of this book is quite tragic.I think this because he said that, L still want to be smart Many people are still mean to him too. HIS one true love Is heartbroken now. He still loves her too, but he knows It wont really work. I dont think that Charlie Is happier than before the surgery, because he knows what it was like to be really smart, and then he had it Hough Charlie will be happy, I dont think he is better off there. All of these reasons are why I think Charlie is a different person from the beginning to the end of the book and that the ending is sad. Charlie is different because he can remember more things, and he is more intelligent. This ending is tragic because Charlie still wants to be smart, and he is put in a place where he is not better rather than being at the Warren Home school. Overall, this was a good and exciting book. I got hooked on this book very early on. I would definitely recommend this book for someone.